Wildlife and Nature

Book Review - Ducks of North America - The Photographers Guide

Ducks Photo books are a dime a dozen, and most rehash all the same stuff over and over again - but E.J. Peiker's book is different, it's targeted specifically at one subject - ducks.  The book does cover all the standard fare topics (equipment, exposure, light, technique . . . and so on) but every subject is directed back to the book's main focus - how it relates to ducks!  The section on field techniques is very detailed and was found to be a strong benefit to enhancing my outdoor acumen - espeically the section on Outdoor Flash Photography.

Field Techniques Section:

  • Approaching Wild Ducks
  • Exposure
  • Composition
  • Natural Light Photography
  • Outdoor Flash Photography
  • Lens Technique
  • Ducks in Flight

It's an easy, enjoyable and informative read!  This is also one book that you'll keep handy as it makes a great "field guide" of ducks, both native and visitors to north america, as it is wonderfully illustrated with E.J's great images.  I use it regularly as a reference to confirm identification.

Now this is an eBook, but I consider that an advantage as it's always with me (in my iPad or iPhone) and available for that quick identification.

You haven't tried an eBook yet?  Well, this is a great one to start with then!

Purchase it Here

I have no affiliation to the vendor in the link provided other than being a satisfied customer.

What You Think's a Great Image May Not Be - And Vise Versa!

Great Blue Heron

We all have certain images that we love, in our eyes they're the best of our best.  (so far at least!) We love them, and we expect others to love them just as much as we do - but it doesn't always work that way.  The opposite can equally be true, images that are "so-so" for us can be a fan favorite.  So why does this happen?

When you look at an image you've made - you actually experienced the capture, the environment, the look, feel and smell of the place.  It invokes a very specific perspective for you (good or bad) that is colored by the experience you've had.  When someone sees an image for the first time, they lack that same perspective.

The image itself (and maybe a short caption) is all they have to go on.  They decide how much they like or dislike the picture based solely on what the image "tells them".  What story does it communicate and does it trigger any emotions in the viewer?  Does it have "personality" or "interestingness"?  Is there a unique element to it that makes it "stick"?  When someone views your image, your personal opinion doesn't matter - case in point is the image at the beginning of this post.

I made this image on an overcast afternoon with rather harsh light.  I wasn't planning on stopping at the river so I didn't have my longest lens, hence the Heron was pretty far away.  When I got home and processed the image, I had to crop in way too far - and due to the harsh light I had to really work over the exposure and level adjustments, there was some noise - and it wasn't as sharp as what I would have liked . . .  and so on.  My experience with this image wasn't the best - when I looked at it, I saw all the "flaws" - that was my vision and my perspective, I didn't really like it because I saw all of the things that should have been done better.  Now just as is the case with an image I really like (due to my experience with it) the viewer of this image is not colored by my perceptions, all they see is color, action and whatever the image communicates to them.

I posted this image on a few sites I frequent just to document my efforts for the day, not thinking much of it.  The next morning, there was some great feedback on the shot - people loved it!  Go figure, so I decided to enter the image into an online weekly contest and it scored a second place (within a hair's width of first) with awesome feedback!  What people saw in that image (without the baggage I was carrying) was a great story, interestingness and emotion!

Keep that in mind the next time someone yawns at an image you've made, without your perspective and experiences as the photographer - does the image carry the load all on it's own, from  a standalone perspective?  I think that's the indicator of a really great image, can it invoke the emotion, color and story - all by itself!

 

 

AutoMagic ISO

[caption id="attachment_86" align="aligncenter" width="480" caption="Eagle vs Eagle"][/caption]

As of this weekend, I'm back to shooting eagles on the Mississippi River. These guys are hard enough to capture and track as they fly above and then dive below the skyline - without having to worry about the correct ISO settings. But the drastic change from light sky to darker waters requires it - or else my shutter speeds would drag to a halt. Maintaining exposure compensation with gloves on is hard enough - adjusting ISO on the fly to be sure I don't run out of shutter speed is just more mental load then I can handle. Enter Auto ISO mode.

Now, not all cameras have this available - but if your's does (check your manual) it's worth playing around with. Here's the routine I run with:
  • In setup, I cap my ISO max setting at 3200
  • Set ISO to "Auto"
  • Shoot in Shutter Priority (Typically 1/1000th of a second for birds in flight)
  • Set initial Exposure Compensation to work for a sky shot

With this setup, my aperture almost always drives as low as it will go (f/5.6 in this case) and my shutter stays constant. So basically I'm locked in at f/5.6 and 1/1000th all the time. As more light (or sensitivity) is needed, my ISO automatically starts to increase.

As usual, this may not be the right or best way - but it's working for me! It allows me to focus on the two things that are most important, framing the shot and adjusting exposure compensation for correct metering. Give it a try and see what you think.

Keeping Your Feet Dry

[caption id="attachment_69" align="alignnone" width="480" caption="Protection from the muck!"][/caption] I found a Great Blue Heron Rookery recently with about thirty nests - along with a great location to get some morning shots. There was just one problem, the "right" spot was about twenty feet into ankle deep water and muck! It was finally time to try out my new Neos Trekker Overshoes!

From this first outing (including a couple hours in the water) I can conclude these things are pretty good! The nice benefit of these overshoes is that you can wear your normal foot-gear (an important point when this is coupled with a several mile hike) and they are very easy to put on. They unwrap to a wide mouth, making it easy to get your boot laden foot in. A quick snap of the buckle, twist wrap the uppers and Velcro in place - You're all set.

They're a snug fit (which is good) and if you're wearing over hiking boots be sure to go up a size for a good fit. Two hours in the water and no leaks. I've heard complaints from some that these leak - I've found no evidence of that, the seams are sealed up pretty well. Since these are water tight, my calves did sweat pretty good and make my jeans damp - maybe that's what they're running into - not much you can do about that though!

If anything changes, I'll post it here, but so far these guys get two thumbs up from me! Looking for a good place to get them? Checkout Outdoorphotogear.com. Great people to deal with, lots of stuff focused at nature photographers, in stock with quick shipping and great customer service.

Preparation Can Pay Off

[caption id="attachment_65" align="alignnone" width="480" caption="Sandhill Crane Taking Flight"][/caption] While scouting some new photo sites, I had a Sandhill Crane take-off to the left of me - about 40 feet away - and I made a couple shots as he was reaching to the sky. I noticed him taking off, deliberately brought my camera to my eye, checked my settings and fired away - not the best pictures, but not all that bad either - especially for the unexpected flight! A couple things came to mind.

I remembered last spring how many times some nice "targets" would suddenly appear in the sky - and just how bad I was at even getting a shot off, much less an acceptable one. I would fumble with my equipment, spot the target and attempt to change my setting and then get a shot off. That's not the case anymore, so what's changed?

Basically, I learned how to better utilize my equipment, pay better attention to what's going on and to walk with camera setup to take unexpected shots. While the first two are important, it's that last one that really pays off! My camera stay in Shutter Priority with at least 1/1,000th setting. Drive mode is set on continuous along with focus, exposure compensation is set for a sky shot and my ISO is set to Auto. Reacting to a suddenly available shot, all I have to do is bring the camera to my face, adjust my exposure compensation if it's not a sky shot and make the picture.

It's working well for me so far this year! Practice and some preparation have paid off and - in case anyone sees me taking those types of shots - I look like I know what I'm doing and not a monkey "romantically engaging a football" if you know what I mean!